What is confirmed?
- Legal position
- Unconfirmed
- Operator access
- Unconfirmed
A current legal finding has not been published.
Operator access has not been verified. Do not infer eligibility from website access.
Not yet reviewed
State reference
Legal position and operator access, checked separately for each model.
A current legal finding has not been published.
Operator access has not been verified. Do not infer eligibility from website access.
Not yet reviewed
A current legal finding has not been published.
Operator access has not been verified. Do not infer eligibility from website access.
Not yet reviewed
Does choosing a lineup make the prize a skill award? See the Alabama evidence and the separate access rules for McLuck and Card Crush.
Alabama’s gambling definitions turn on risking something of value, an uncertain outcome and the possibility of receiving something of value. The state’s definition of a contest of chance allows for the player’s skill to be one factor. Code of Alabama §13A-12-20
Access as of November 10, 2026. Neither operator names Alabama in its general territory exclusions. That leaves prize eligibility unconfirmed for both McLuck sweepstakes and Card Crush prize games: supplier rules and state law still apply. McLuck’s November 4 terms · Card Crush’s August 5 terms
Follow the award, not just the moves. In a card battle you might win by changing the order of your cards. If a separate spin determines whether you receive redeemable coins, the spin is the outcome to examine under Alabama’s definition. For a two-currency game, identify what you put at risk on that spin.
For a game with a deck and a separate prize balance, trace the card and the coins through one example. For the distinctions between types of games, compare the models.
Next change: no future effective date for either model is confirmed in the sources cited here.
Something changed? Send a correction.