What is confirmed?
- Legal position
- Unconfirmed
- Operator access
- Unconfirmed
A current legal finding has not been published.
Operator access has not been verified. Do not infer eligibility from website access.
Not yet reviewed
State reference
Alaska
Legal position and operator access, checked separately for each model.
What is confirmed?
- Legal position
- Unconfirmed
- Operator access
- Unconfirmed
A current legal finding has not been published.
Operator access has not been verified. Do not infer eligibility from website access.
Not yet reviewed
The short answer
Does Alaska’s computer-game opinion cover my app? See the Alaska evidence and the separate access rules for McLuck and Card Crush.
An Alaska Department of Law opinion on computer video games explains why the state’s gambling definition matters when a game awards something of value. It is a historical legal analysis, not a current approval for a named app. Alaska Department of Law opinion on computer video games
Access as of November 10, 2026. Neither operator names Alaska in its general territory exclusions. That leaves prize eligibility unconfirmed for both McLuck sweepstakes and Card Crush prize games: supplier rules and state law still apply. McLuck’s November 4 terms · Card Crush’s August 5 terms
Does Alaska’s computer-game opinion cover my app?
The old opinion is useful for a narrow question: what does the game actually award? A card that stays in your deck and a balance that can become a gift card are different answers. If an operator cites the opinion, ask which game in it matches both the way you enter and the prize you can take out.
If an operator claims approval, match the company, game and prize terms to the claim. For the distinctions between types of games, compare the models.
Next change: no future effective date for either model is confirmed in the sources cited here.
Something changed? Send a correction.