What is confirmed?
- Legal position
- Unconfirmed
- Operator access
- Unconfirmed
A current legal finding has not been published.
Operator access has not been verified. Do not infer eligibility from website access.
Not yet reviewed
State reference
Legal position and operator access, checked separately for each model.
A current legal finding has not been published.
Operator access has not been verified. Do not infer eligibility from website access.
Not yet reviewed
A current legal finding has not been published.
Operator access has not been verified. Do not infer eligibility from website access.
Not yet reviewed
Which balance is at risk when I start a round? See the Oregon evidence and the separate access rules for McLuck and Card Crush.
Oregon distinguishes casino games, contests of chance and gambling in its criminal statutes. The gambling definition addresses risking value on an outcome with an understanding that a participant may receive value. Oregon Revised Statutes, chapter 167
Access as of November 10, 2026. Neither operator names Oregon in its general territory exclusions. That leaves prize eligibility unconfirmed for both McLuck sweepstakes and Card Crush prize games: supplier rules and state law still apply. McLuck’s November 4 terms · Card Crush’s August 5 terms
Check whether the selected unit buys entertainment only, can be lost in a prize game or can qualify for redemption. Oregon’s definitions make what the player risks and may receive relevant. On a card platform, record the outcome of the prize session separately from the outcome of a battle.
For a game with a deck and a separate prize balance, trace the card and the coins through one example. For the distinctions between types of games, compare the models.
Next change: no future effective date for either model is confirmed in the sources cited here.
Something changed? Send a correction.